NBA Picks – Mar 06

Went 6-4-1 yesterday.  That’s brings us to 24-14-1 on the week, or right around 63%.  Let’s go

Golden State (+10.5) @ Charlotte

Atlanta (+1.5) @ Miami

New Jersey (+8) @ New York

Houston (-3.5) @ Minnesota

Dallas (-1) @ Chicago

San Antonio (-1.5) @ Memphis

Cleveland (-3.5) @ Miliwaukee

Los Angeles Clippers (+13.5) @ Utah

Indiana (+12.5) @ Phoenix

NBA Picks – Mar 05

Went 1-2 yesterday.  That’s brings us to 18-10 on the week, or 64%.  Looks like eleven games on tap tonight.  Heeeeeeeeeeeeeeere we go

Milwaukee (-4) @ Washington

Los Angeles Lakers (-3.5) @ Charlotte

Detroit (+12) @ Cleveland

New York (+8) @ Toronto

Boston (-6) @ Philadelphia

Golden State (+13) @ Atlanta

Orlando (-10) @ New Jersey

Sacramento (+8.5) @ Dallas

Indiana (+10) @ Denver

New Orleans (+8) @ San Antonio

Oklahoma City (-4.5) @ Los Angeles Clippers

NBA Picks – Mar 04

I went 8-4 yesterday.  My mark for the week is now 17-8, I am at exactly 68% for the week.  On to the picks.

Memphis (+5.5) @ Chicago

Los Angeles Lakers (-5.5) @ Miami

Utah (+1.5) @ Phoenix

Dorkapalooza 2010

I’ll be there on Saturday at the event also known as the MIT Sloan Sports Analytics Conference. I’m unlikely to liveblog as that will be too distracting but we may have to bust out the old Twitter feed. Any requests?

NBA Picks – Mar 03

Went 3-1 yesterday.  I am currently at 69% for the week.  Lots of games tonight.  Let’s see what happens.  Side note, Van Tran as of 11pm last night was up a grand on the week so far.

Golden State (+15) @ Orlando

Philapdelphia (+8.5) @ Atlanta

Cleveland (-9.5) @ New Jersey

Charlotte (+4.5) @ Boston

Detroit (+3.5) @ New York

Washington (+10) @ Milwaukee

Memphis (+2) @ New Orleans

Minnesota (+14) @ Dallas

Sacramento (+7.5) @ Houston

Oklahoma City (+7.5) @ Denver

Indiana (+8.5) @ Portland

Phoenix (-3.5) @ Los Angeles Clippers

NBA Picks – Mar 02

Went 6-3 yesterday.  I currently sit at 66% for the week.  Let’s keep this train rolling, may have time to add some college games…and apparently i will ’cause I just looked and there’s only two pro games.  Here we go

Sacramento (+10.5) @ Oklahoma City

Indiana (+12) @ Los Angeles Lakers

EDIT : TWO ADDITIONAL GAMES, WERE NOT ON PINNACLESPORTS THIS MORNING

Boston (-4.5) @ Detroit

Golden State (+10.5) @ Miami

I just looked at college lines and I am clueless.  I’ll try to do some work on this as conference champ week gets going soon.

NBA Picks – Mar 01

A few days, weeks, whatever ago I made a post saying I was going to start picking games and keeping track of them.  But a few roadblocks have managed to stop this from happening.  So I am going to do something different and for the next week I am simply going to force myself to make picks against the spread in the NBA.  These should not be considered knowledge based picks, I am simply forcing myself to pick every game to see if I have a clue as to what’s going on.  Here we go

Dallas (+3) @ Charlotte

Orlando (-4) @ Philadelphia

New York (+11) @ Cleveland

San Antonio (-2.5) @ New Orleans

Atlanta (+1) @ Chicago

Portland (-1) @ Memphis

Toronto (+6) @ Houston

Denver (+2.5) @ Phoenix

Utah (-6.5) @ Los Angeles Clippers

This is me simply dragging myself towards taking the first step on making daily picks.  We’ll see how things went with these tomorrow when I post tomorrow’s picks.

NBA Line

There is a chnace I read the line wrong last night but I am pretty sure the opening line on Cavs/Celtics was Celts -1.  The latest line is Cavs -2.5, meaning the line has moved 3.5 points in twelve hours.  Let’s see what happens.

Olympic Links

All Olympics, all the time.

First, a fascinating look at scalping tickets at the winter games.

Olympic ticketing has its set process. Organizers generally sell seats as far ahead of the Games as they can, slowly releasing batches for the premier events first — in order to maximize cash flow in the years leading up to the festival. Pools of seats are then made available to citizens of the host nation, and anything that’s left goes to general sale nine to 12 months before the Opening Ceremony. So the Games are usually either “sold out” or “95 percent booked.” It only takes one visit to the Olympics to know that this type of news is all useless misnomer that should be completely ignored.

Apolo Ohno – Old Person?

Why Scandanavian countries aren’t any good at figure skating.

A majority of Canada’s hockey players are left handed. I don’t know hockey well enough to say, but maybe there’s a strategic advantage in being left handed, like in baseball, creating a self selection bias toward those players.

Roughly 60 percent of the Easton hockey sticks sold in Canada are for left-handed shots, Mountain said. In the United States, he said, about 60 percent of sticks sold are for right-handed shots. Figures over the years from other manufacturers have put the ratio discrepancy between the two countries as high as 70 to 30.

The difference even trickles over into golf, where the swing is not unlike that of a slap shot. According to the Professional Golfers Association, 7 percent of Canadian golfers play left-handed, which is proportionally more than any other nationality. The reason is probably that Canadians pick up a hockey stick first and are therefore imprinted by the time they take up golf. Especially if they are from Quebec, where hockey players are even more left-handed than players in the rest of Canada.

Oddly, British Columbia — sometimes said to be the most American-like of the Canadian provinces — skews the other way. “The rest of the country goes 2 to 1 in favor of left sticks, but it’s reversed in B.C.,” said Marc Poirier, a customer service representative who handles Canadian orders for Warrior Sticks.

Europeans also tend to be left-handed shooters. The International Ice Hockey Federation does not keep figures by European nationality, the communications director Szymon Szemberg said. But, he said, lefty shooters have predominated. “For long spells, the great Soviet teams of the ’80s never had a player who shot right,” Szemberg said.

Boston.com has a kickass photo blog for the Olympics so far.

As if curling wasn’t cool enough, the US curling team has it’s own condom.

Lastly, what’s better than a women’s hockey brawl in an Olympic qualifier? Don’t miss the score.

Gambling Thoughts

I’ll preface this by saying I’m not really breaking new ground here. 

Other day Louis was talking to me about the idea of creating a gambling program where someone could be exposed to an extrememly high number of past games with spread knowledge in a short amount of time to make them a better sport gambler.  Something akin to the idea that you become a better poker player by playing lots of hands, so internet people have an advantage because they play so many in so rapid an amount of time. 

I think there is a little bit of merit in this, but limited.  First of all we will throw out the idea for the moment that such a program could be created in the foreseeable future.  You would need some Matrix-like thing going on where the person uploads game data into their brains at a rapid rate.  But if such a program existed, the question arises, would it have the results Lou thinks it would.  And to an extent I think the answer is yes.

The main problem is that Vegas essentially already has something like Lou’s hypothetical idea with those simulations they run in computers.  That, after all, is often how the spread is figured, they are running advanced machines to find out what the difference in a game is likely to be.  I cannot decide if Louis’ idea should be described as being (A) different from or (B) being more finely tuned than these simulations.  The idea is different from the simulations in that he wants to figure out future score totals in relation to the spread instead of creating a spread itself, but at the same time, is that not just saying that he wants an outrageously accurate score indicator?  In either case, the task is tough.

But Lou does have one obvious advantage, and that is that Vegas has a set of handcuffs on it, namely, the betting public.  If the public thinks one way strong enough, Vegas is going to often yield to that in making a line.  This is evident in setting the line itself, and in subsequent adjustments.  Teams like the Lakers and Cowboys will routinely get more respect in regards to the line simply because the bookies know where the action is going to go.  I was on a site the other day that noted that the Lakers over the last 10 years weren’t even close to breaking even against the spread, even though, they’ve obviously been very successful.  As mentioned, the public’s influence will also transfer to line adjustments.  A recent example of this was the Packers/Cards Wild Card game this year where the line opened at Cards -2.5.  By kickoff of that game 80% of the betting public (Allen “three Benjamins” Gowin) was on the Packers, and the line had to be moved to Packers -2.5. 

And it is here where Louis’ slim hopes lie at getting rich off his Matrix program.  If Vegas strictly set spreads without the betting public in mind, Louis’ plan could not work for him, as they would be using the most in-tuned sports minds and up-to-the-minute programs and data to set the spreads.  It is in Vegas’ act of covering its own ass that salvation lies for the merit in Louis’ idea, when the sports public forces Vegas to at times make a road team a favorite against a defending conference champion. 

As a brief note at the end, this could encourage a group to take a game, throw a ton of money on one side to pop the line in a certain direction, and then once the line moves a decent amount, throw an absolute shit ton of money on the other side.