<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Miracle Covers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://miraclecovers.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://miraclecovers.com</link>
	<description>Winning at Sports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:58:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>NBA picks &#8211; A Recap</title>
		<link>http://miraclecovers.com/2010/03/nba-picks-a-recap/</link>
		<comments>http://miraclecovers.com/2010/03/nba-picks-a-recap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pat</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://miraclecovers.com/?p=743</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So yesterday I went 1-4.  There were actually six games but the Philly one was not listed Sunday morning, we will ignore that game and pretend it didn&#8217;t happen.  Accordingly, I finished the week at 28-24-1, or at 54%  Which I think means that if I had placed thirty dollar bets on everything, and everything [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So yesterday I went 1-4.  There were actually six games but the Philly one was not listed Sunday morning, we will ignore that game and pretend it didn&#8217;t happen.  Accordingly, I finished the week at 28-24-1, or at 54%  Which I think means that if I had placed thirty dollar bets on everything, and everything had been -110, I would have a net positive of thirty-six bucks.  Take that Vegas.  Tremble.  I might be wrong on the math if anyone wants to check that out.  This upcoming week, college basketball.  And speaking of which, Fairfield (+8) plays Siena this evening in the MAAC Chamionships.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://miraclecovers.com/2010/03/nba-picks-a-recap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NBA Picks &#8211; Mar 07</title>
		<link>http://miraclecovers.com/2010/03/nba-picks-mar-07/</link>
		<comments>http://miraclecovers.com/2010/03/nba-picks-mar-07/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 14:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pat</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://miraclecovers.com/?p=741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Worst day of the week at 3-6 yesterday.  Now at 27-20-1.  The experiment concludes&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..
Los Angeles Lakers (+2.5) @ Orlando

Houston (-2) @ Detroit
Washington (+12) @ Boston
Oklahoma City (-3.5) @ Sacramento
Portland (+6.5) @ Denver
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Worst day of the week at 3-6 yesterday.  Now at 27-20-1.  The experiment concludes&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
<p>Los Angeles Lakers (+2.5) @ <strong>Orlando<br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>Houston (-2)</strong> @ Detroit</p>
<p>Washington (+12) @ <strong>Boston</strong></p>
<p>Oklahoma City (-3.5) @ <strong>Sacramento</strong></p>
<p>Portland (+6.5) @ <strong>Denver</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://miraclecovers.com/2010/03/nba-picks-mar-07/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Midnight Zen</title>
		<link>http://miraclecovers.com/2010/03/midnight-zen/</link>
		<comments>http://miraclecovers.com/2010/03/midnight-zen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 05:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lou</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Basketball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dorkapalooza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://miraclecovers.com/?p=736</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Full day today at the Sloan Conference.  I&#8217;ll have lots coming in the next week or two.  For now you can catch twitter links here.  Truehoop has a writeup on all panels basketball here. 
Completely unrelated, it seems as though the European Poker Tour was recently robbed of over a million euros [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Full day today at the Sloan Conference.  I&#8217;ll have lots coming in the next week or two.  For now you can catch twitter links <a href="http://twitter.com/search?q=%23ssac">here</a>.  Truehoop has a writeup on all panels basketball <a href="http://espn.go.com/blog/truehoop/post/_/id/14071/basketball-analytics-the-users">here</a>. </p>
<p>Completely unrelated, it seems as though the European Poker Tour was <a href="http://www.pokernews.com/news/2010/03/breaking-news-armed-robbery-suspends-play-at-ept-berlin-8006.htm">recently robbed of over a million euros during a live taping</a>.  Video Below.  Maybe they got their idea from the World Series of Dice?  </p>
<p><object width="480" height="320"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/QFn3XxRWcO0&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/QFn3XxRWcO0&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="320"></embed></object></p>
<table style='font:11px arial; color:#333; background-color:#f5f5f5' cellpadding='0' cellspacing='0' width='360' height='353'>
<tbody>
<tr style='background-color:#e5e5e5' valign='middle'>
<td style='padding:2px 1px 0px 5px;'><a target='_blank' style='color:#333; text-decoration:none; font-weight:bold;' href='http://www.comedycentral.com/shows/chappelles_show/index.jhtml'>Chappelle&#8217;s Show</a></td>
<td style='padding:2px 5px 0px 5px; text-align:right; font-weight:bold;'></td>
</tr>
<tr style='height:14px;' valign='middle'>
<td style='padding:2px 1px 0px 5px;' colspan='2'<a target='_blank' style='color:#333; text-decoration:none; font-weight:bold;' href='http://www.comedycentral.com/videos/index.jhtml?videoId=185109&#038;title=the-world-series-of-dice'>The World Series of Dice<a></td>
</tr>
<tr style='height:14px; background-color:#353535' valign='middle'>
<td colspan='2' style='padding:2px 5px 0px 5px; width:360px; overflow:hidden; text-align:right'><a target='_blank' style='color:#96deff; text-decoration:none; font-weight:bold;' href='http://www.comedycentral.com/'>www.comedycentral.com</a></td>
</tr>
<tr valign='middle'>
<td style='padding:0px;' colspan='2'><embed style='display:block' src='http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:185109' width='360' height='301' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' wmode='window' allowFullscreen='true' flashvars='autoPlay=false' allowscriptaccess='always' allownetworking='all' bgcolor='#000000'></embed></td>
</tr>
<tr style='height:18px;' valign='middle'>
<td style='padding:0px;' colspan='2'>
<table style='margin:0px; text-align:center' cellpadding='0' cellspacing='0' width='100%' height='100%'>
<tr valign='middle'>
<td style='padding:3px; width:33%;'><a target='_blank' style='font:10px arial; color:#333; text-decoration:none;' href='http://shop.comedycentral.com/?v=comedy-central_shows_chappelles-show&#038;SESSID=870783e1901f9dd5c2769413fc45aa24'>Buy Chappelle&#8217;s Show DVDs</a></td>
<td style='padding:3px; width:33%;'><a target='_blank' style='font:10px arial; color:#333; text-decoration:none;' href='http://www.comedycentral.com/shows/chappelles_show/videos/index.jhtml'>Black Comedy</a></td>
<td style='padding:3px; width:33%;'><a target='_blank' style='font:10px arial; color:#333; text-decoration:none;' href='http://www.comedycentral.com/videos/index.jhtml?videoId=11909&#038;title=hes-rick-james'>True Hollywood Story</a></td>
</tr>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://miraclecovers.com/2010/03/midnight-zen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NBA Picks &#8211; Mar 06</title>
		<link>http://miraclecovers.com/2010/03/nba-picks-mar-06/</link>
		<comments>http://miraclecovers.com/2010/03/nba-picks-mar-06/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 13:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pat</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Basketball]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://miraclecovers.com/?p=730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Went 6-4-1 yesterday.  That&#8217;s brings us to 24-14-1 on the week, or right around 63%.  Let&#8217;s go
Golden State (+10.5) @ Charlotte
Atlanta (+1.5) @ Miami
New Jersey (+8) @ New York
Houston (-3.5) @ Minnesota
Dallas (-1) @ Chicago
San Antonio (-1.5) @ Memphis
Cleveland (-3.5) @ Miliwaukee
Los Angeles Clippers (+13.5) @ Utah
Indiana (+12.5) @ Phoenix
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Went 6-4-1 yesterday.  That&#8217;s brings us to 24-14-1 on the week, or right around 63%.  Let&#8217;s go</p>
<p><strong>Golden State (+10.5)</strong> @ Charlotte</p>
<p><strong>Atlanta (+1.5) </strong>@ Miami</p>
<p><strong>New Jersey (+8)</strong> @ New York</p>
<p><strong>Houston (-3.5) </strong>@ Minnesota</p>
<p>Dallas (-1) @ <strong>Chicago</strong></p>
<p>San Antonio (-1.5) @ <strong>Memphis</strong></p>
<p><strong>Cleveland (-3.5) </strong>@ Miliwaukee</p>
<p><strong>Los Angeles Clippers (+13.5) </strong>@ Utah</p>
<p><strong>Indiana (+12.5) </strong>@ Phoenix</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://miraclecovers.com/2010/03/nba-picks-mar-06/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NBA Picks &#8211; Mar 05</title>
		<link>http://miraclecovers.com/2010/03/nba-picks-mar-05/</link>
		<comments>http://miraclecovers.com/2010/03/nba-picks-mar-05/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 17:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pat</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Basketball]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://miraclecovers.com/?p=728</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Went 1-2 yesterday.  That&#8217;s brings us to 18-10 on the week, or 64%.  Looks like eleven games on tap tonight.  Heeeeeeeeeeeeeeere we go
Milwaukee (-4) @ Washington
Los Angeles Lakers (-3.5) @ Charlotte
Detroit (+12) @ Cleveland
New York (+8) @ Toronto
Boston (-6) @ Philadelphia
Golden State (+13) @ Atlanta
Orlando (-10) @ New Jersey
Sacramento (+8.5) @ Dallas
Indiana (+10) @ Denver
New [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Went 1-2 yesterday.  That&#8217;s brings us to 18-10 on the week, or 64%.  Looks like eleven games on tap tonight.  Heeeeeeeeeeeeeeere we go</p>
<p><strong>Milwaukee (-4)</strong> @ Washington</p>
<p>Los Angeles Lakers (-3.5) @ <strong>Charlotte</strong></p>
<p>Detroit (+12) @ <strong>Cleveland</strong></p>
<p><strong>New York (+8) </strong>@ Toronto</p>
<p>Boston (-6) @<strong> Philadelphia</strong></p>
<p>Golden State (+13) @ <strong>Atlanta</strong></p>
<p><strong>Orlando (-10) </strong>@ New Jersey</p>
<p><strong>Sacramento (+8.5) </strong>@ Dallas</p>
<p>Indiana (+10) @ <strong>Denver</strong></p>
<p>New Orleans (+8) @ <strong>San Antonio</strong></p>
<p><strong>Oklahoma City (-4.5) </strong>@ Los Angeles Clippers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://miraclecovers.com/2010/03/nba-picks-mar-05/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NBA Picks &#8211; Mar 04</title>
		<link>http://miraclecovers.com/2010/03/nba-picks-mar-04/</link>
		<comments>http://miraclecovers.com/2010/03/nba-picks-mar-04/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 21:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pat</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Basketball]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://miraclecovers.com/?p=725</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I went 8-4 yesterday.  My mark for the week is now 17-8, I am at exactly 68% for the week.  On to the picks.
Memphis (+5.5) @ Chicago
Los Angeles Lakers (-5.5) @ Miami
Utah (+1.5) @ Phoenix
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went 8-4 yesterday.  My mark for the week is now 17-8, I am at exactly 68% for the week.  On to the picks.</p>
<p><strong>Memphis (+5.5) </strong>@ Chicago</p>
<p><strong>Los Angeles Lakers (-5.5) </strong>@ Miami</p>
<p>Utah (+1.5) @ <strong>Phoenix</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://miraclecovers.com/2010/03/nba-picks-mar-04/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dorkapalooza 2010</title>
		<link>http://miraclecovers.com/2010/03/dorkapalooza-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://miraclecovers.com/2010/03/dorkapalooza-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 14:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lou</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dorkapalooza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://miraclecovers.com/?p=717</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ll be there on Saturday at the event also known as the MIT Sloan Sports Analytics Conference.  I&#8217;m unlikely to liveblog as that will be too distracting but we may have to bust out the old Twitter feed.  Any requests?  
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll be there on Saturday at the event also known as the <a href="http://www.sloansportsconference.com/2010/">MIT Sloan Sports Analytics Conference</a>.  I&#8217;m unlikely to liveblog as that will be too distracting but we may have to bust out the old Twitter feed.  Any requests?  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://miraclecovers.com/2010/03/dorkapalooza-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NBA Picks &#8211; Mar 03</title>
		<link>http://miraclecovers.com/2010/03/nba-picks-mar-03/</link>
		<comments>http://miraclecovers.com/2010/03/nba-picks-mar-03/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pat</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Basketball]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://miraclecovers.com/?p=714</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Went 3-1 yesterday.  I am currently at 69% for the week.  Lots of games tonight.  Let&#8217;s see what happens.  Side note, Van Tran as of 11pm last night was up a grand on the week so far.
Golden State (+15) @ Orlando
Philapdelphia (+8.5) @ Atlanta
Cleveland (-9.5) @ New Jersey
Charlotte (+4.5) @ Boston
Detroit (+3.5) @ New York
Washington (+10) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Went 3-1 yesterday.  I am currently at 69% for the week.  Lots of games tonight.  Let&#8217;s see what happens.  Side note, Van Tran as of 11pm last night was up a grand on the week so far.</p>
<p><strong>Golden State (+15)</strong> @ Orlando</p>
<p>Philapdelphia (+8.5) @ <strong>Atlanta</strong></p>
<p><strong>Cleveland (-9.5)</strong> @ New Jersey</p>
<p><strong>Charlotte (+4.5) </strong>@ Boston</p>
<p>Detroit (+3.5) @ <strong>New York</strong></p>
<p><strong>Washington (+10) </strong>@ Milwaukee</p>
<p><strong>Memphis (+2) </strong>@ New Orleans</p>
<p><strong>Minnesota (+14) </strong>@ Dallas</p>
<p>Sacramento (+7.5) @ <strong>Houston</strong></p>
<p><strong>Oklahoma City (+7.5) </strong>@ Denver</p>
<p>Indiana (+8.5) @ <strong>Portland</strong></p>
<p><strong>Phoenix (-3.5) </strong>@ Los Angeles Clippers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://miraclecovers.com/2010/03/nba-picks-mar-03/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NBA Picks &#8211; Mar 02</title>
		<link>http://miraclecovers.com/2010/03/nba-picks-mar-02/</link>
		<comments>http://miraclecovers.com/2010/03/nba-picks-mar-02/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 13:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pat</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Basketball]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://miraclecovers.com/?p=710</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Went 6-3 yesterday.  I currently sit at 66% for the week.  Let&#8217;s keep this train rolling, may have time to add some college games&#8230;and apparently i will &#8217;cause I just looked and there&#8217;s only two pro games.  Here we go
Sacramento (+10.5) @ Oklahoma City
Indiana (+12) @ Los Angeles Lakers
EDIT : TWO ADDITIONAL GAMES, WERE NOT [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Went 6-3 yesterday.  I currently sit at 66% for the week.  Let&#8217;s keep this train rolling, may have time to add some college games&#8230;and apparently i will &#8217;cause I just looked and there&#8217;s only two pro games.  Here we go</p>
<p><strong>Sacramento (+10.5)</strong> @ Oklahoma City</p>
<p>Indiana (+12) @ <strong>Los Angeles Lakers</strong></p>
<p><strong>EDIT : TWO ADDITIONAL GAMES, WERE NOT ON PINNACLESPORTS THIS MORNING</strong></p>
<p>Boston (-4.5) @ <strong>Detroit</strong></p>
<p><strong>Golden State (+10.5)</strong> @ Miami</p>
<p>I just looked at college lines and I am clueless.  I&#8217;ll try to do some work on this as conference champ week gets going soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://miraclecovers.com/2010/03/nba-picks-mar-02/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NBA Picks &#8211; Mar 01</title>
		<link>http://miraclecovers.com/2010/03/nba-picks-mar-01/</link>
		<comments>http://miraclecovers.com/2010/03/nba-picks-mar-01/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 19:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pat</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Basketball]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://miraclecovers.com/?p=708</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few days, weeks, whatever ago I made a post saying I was going to start picking games and keeping track of them.  But a few roadblocks have managed to stop this from happening.  So I am going to do something different and for the next week I am simply going to force myself to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few days, weeks, whatever ago I made a post saying I was going to start picking games and keeping track of them.  But a few roadblocks have managed to stop this from happening.  So I am going to do something different and for the next week I am simply going to force myself to make picks against the spread in the NBA.  These should not be considered knowledge based picks, I am simply forcing myself to pick every game to see if I have a clue as to what&#8217;s going on.  Here we go</p>
<p><strong>Dallas (+3) </strong>@ Charlotte</p>
<p><strong>Orlando (-4)</strong> @ Philadelphia</p>
<p>New York (+11) @ <strong>Cleveland</strong></p>
<p><strong>San Antonio (-2.5) </strong>@ New Orleans</p>
<p><strong>Atlanta (+1)</strong> @ Chicago</p>
<p>Portland (-1) @ <strong>Memphis</strong></p>
<p><strong>Toronto (+6) </strong>@ Houston</p>
<p><strong>Denver (+2.5) </strong>@ Phoenix</p>
<p>Utah (-6.5) @ <strong>Los Angeles Clippers</strong></p>
<p>This is me simply dragging myself towards taking the first step on making daily picks.  We&#8217;ll see how things went with these tomorrow when I post tomorrow&#8217;s picks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://miraclecovers.com/2010/03/nba-picks-mar-01/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NBA Line</title>
		<link>http://miraclecovers.com/2010/02/nba-line/</link>
		<comments>http://miraclecovers.com/2010/02/nba-line/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pat</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Basketball]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://miraclecovers.com/?p=706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is a chnace I read the line wrong last night but I am pretty sure the opening line on Cavs/Celtics was Celts -1.  The latest line is Cavs -2.5, meaning the line has moved 3.5 points in twelve hours.  Let&#8217;s see what happens.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a chnace I read the line wrong last night but I am pretty sure the opening line on Cavs/Celtics was Celts -1.  The latest line is Cavs -2.5, meaning the line has moved 3.5 points in twelve hours.  Let&#8217;s see what happens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://miraclecovers.com/2010/02/nba-line/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Olympic Links</title>
		<link>http://miraclecovers.com/2010/02/olympic-links/</link>
		<comments>http://miraclecovers.com/2010/02/olympic-links/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 18:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lou</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://miraclecovers.com/?p=703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All Olympics, all the time.  
First, a fascinating look at scalping tickets at the winter games.  
Olympic ticketing has its set process. Organizers generally sell seats as far ahead of the Games as they can, slowly releasing batches for the premier events first &#8212; in order to maximize cash flow in the years [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All Olympics, all the time.  </p>
<p>First, a fascinating look at <a href="http://www.swifterhigher.com/2010/02/whos-selling-whos-buying.php">scalping tickets at the winter games</a>.  </p>
<blockquote><p>Olympic ticketing has its set process. Organizers generally sell seats as far ahead of the Games as they can, slowly releasing batches for the premier events first &#8212; in order to maximize cash flow in the years leading up to the festival. Pools of seats are then made available to citizens of the host nation, and anything that&#8217;s left goes to general sale nine to 12 months before the Opening Ceremony. So the Games are usually either &#8220;sold out&#8221; or &#8220;95 percent booked.&#8221; It only takes one visit to the Olympics to know that this type of news is all useless misnomer that should be completely ignored.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.sports-reference.com/olympics/blog/?p=106">Apolo Ohno &#8211; Old Person?</a></p>
<p><a href="http://ewot.typepad.com/the_economic_way_of_think/2010/02/why-arent-the-scandinavians-good-at-figure-skating.html">Why Scandanavian countries aren&#8217;t any good at figure skating</a>.    </p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/16/sports/olympics/16lefty.html">A majority of Canada&#8217;s hockey players are left handed</a>.  I don&#8217;t know hockey well enough to say, but maybe there&#8217;s a strategic advantage in being left handed, like in baseball, creating a self selection bias toward those players.   </p>
<blockquote><p>Roughly 60 percent of the Easton hockey sticks sold in Canada are for left-handed shots, Mountain said. In the United States, he said, about 60 percent of sticks sold are for right-handed shots. Figures over the years from other manufacturers have put the ratio discrepancy between the two countries as high as 70 to 30.</p>
<p>The difference even trickles over into golf, where the swing is not unlike that of a slap shot. According to the Professional Golfers Association, 7 percent of Canadian golfers play left-handed, which is proportionally more than any other nationality. The reason is probably that Canadians pick up a hockey stick first and are therefore imprinted by the time they take up golf. Especially if they are from Quebec, where hockey players are even more left-handed than players in the rest of Canada.</p>
<p>Oddly, British Columbia — sometimes said to be the most American-like of the Canadian provinces — skews the other way. “The rest of the country goes 2 to 1 in favor of left sticks, but it’s reversed in B.C.,” said Marc Poirier, a customer service representative who handles Canadian orders for Warrior Sticks.</p>
<p>Europeans also tend to be left-handed shooters. The International Ice Hockey Federation does not keep figures by European nationality, the communications director Szymon Szemberg said. But, he said, lefty shooters have predominated. “For long spells, the great Soviet teams of the ’80s never had a player who shot right,” Szemberg said.</p></blockquote>
<p>Boston.com has a <a href="http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2010/02/vancouver_2010_part_1_of_2.html">kickass photo blog</a> for the Olympics so far.   </p>
<p>As if curling wasn&#8217;t cool enough, <a href="http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/35439222/ns/today-today_in_vancouver">the US curling team has it&#8217;s own condom</a>.  </p>
<p>Lastly, what&#8217;s better than a women&#8217;s hockey brawl in an Olympic qualifier?  Don&#8217;t miss the score.  <object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/mQW0LNc6yDo&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/mQW0LNc6yDo&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://miraclecovers.com/2010/02/olympic-links/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gambling Thoughts</title>
		<link>http://miraclecovers.com/2010/02/gambling-thoughts/</link>
		<comments>http://miraclecovers.com/2010/02/gambling-thoughts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pat</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://miraclecovers.com/?p=698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ll preface this by saying I&#8217;m not really breaking new ground here. 
Other day Louis was talking to me about the idea of creating a gambling program where someone could be exposed to an extrememly high number of past games with spread knowledge in a short amount of time to make them a better sport gambler.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll preface this by saying I&#8217;m not really breaking new ground here. </p>
<p>Other day Louis was talking to me about the idea of creating a gambling program where someone could be exposed to an extrememly high number of past games with spread knowledge in a short amount of time to make them a better sport gambler.  Something akin to the idea that you become a better poker player by playing lots of hands, so internet people have an advantage because they play so many in so rapid an amount of time. </p>
<p>I think there is a little bit of merit in this, but limited.  First of all we will throw out the idea for the moment that such a program could be created in the foreseeable future.  You would need some Matrix-like thing going on where the person uploads game data into their brains at a rapid rate.  But if such a program existed, the question arises, would it have the results Lou thinks it would.  And to an extent I think the answer is yes.</p>
<p>The main problem is that Vegas essentially already has something like Lou&#8217;s hypothetical idea with those simulations they run in computers.  That, after all, is often how the spread is figured, they are running advanced machines to find out what the difference in a game is likely to be.  I cannot decide if Louis&#8217; idea should be described as being (A) different from or (B) being more finely tuned than these simulations.  The idea is different from the simulations in that he wants to figure out future score totals in relation to the spread instead of creating a spread itself, but at the same time, is that not just saying that he wants an outrageously accurate score indicator?  In either case, the task is tough.</p>
<p>But Lou does have one obvious advantage, and that is that Vegas has a set of handcuffs on it, namely, the betting public.  If the public thinks one way strong enough, Vegas is going to often yield to that in making a line.  This is evident in setting the line itself, and in subsequent adjustments.  Teams like the Lakers and Cowboys will routinely get more respect in regards to the line simply because the bookies know where the action is going to go.  I was on a site the other day that noted that the Lakers over the last 10 years weren&#8217;t even close to breaking even against the spread, even though, they&#8217;ve obviously been very successful.  As mentioned, the public&#8217;s influence will also transfer to line adjustments.  A recent example of this was the Packers/Cards Wild Card game this year where the line opened at Cards -2.5.  By kickoff of that game 80% of the betting public (Allen &#8220;three Benjamins&#8221; Gowin) was on the Packers, and the line had to be moved to <em>Packers</em> -2.5. </p>
<p>And it is here where Louis&#8217; slim hopes lie at getting rich off his Matrix program.  If Vegas strictly set spreads without the betting public in mind, Louis&#8217; plan could not work for him, as they would be using the most in-tuned sports minds and up-to-the-minute programs and data to set the spreads.  It is in Vegas&#8217; act of covering its own ass that salvation lies for the merit in Louis&#8217; idea, when the sports public forces Vegas to at times make a road team a favorite against a defending conference champion. </p>
<p>As a brief note at the end, this could encourage a group to take a game, throw a ton of money on one side to pop the line in a certain direction, and then once the line moves a decent amount, throw an absolute <em>shit ton</em> of money on the other side.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://miraclecovers.com/2010/02/gambling-thoughts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Links</title>
		<link>http://miraclecovers.com/2010/02/friday-links-0210/</link>
		<comments>http://miraclecovers.com/2010/02/friday-links-0210/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lou</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Basketball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soccer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://miraclecovers.com/?p=690</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michael Vick is back in the news this week.  From Mark Bradley of the Atlanta Journal-Constitution:
I was encouraged to hear that Michael Vick, in advance of his reality show that debuts Tuesday on BET , is saying he led “a double life,” and I use the word “encouraged” advisedly. Because you don’t know how [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael Vick is back in the news this week.  <a href="http://blogs.ajc.com/mark-bradley-blog/2010/01/31/michael-vick-and-his-double-life-how-exactly-did-he-do-it/">From Mark Bradley of the Atlanta Journal-Constitution</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>I was encouraged to hear that Michael Vick, in advance of his reality show that debuts Tuesday on BET , is saying he led “a double life,” and I use the word “encouraged” advisedly. Because you don’t know how many times I’ve asked myself and asked people who worked inside the building at 4400 Falcon Parkway if I/they had any hint — any hint — of what was to come.</p>
<p>And I did not. Which might make me the world’s worst reporter, except that I’ve not yet found anyone within the compound who saw it coming, either.</p>
<p>I know, I know. People on the outside will harrumph and say they knew  it all along because he wore his hair in corn rows and dressed in a manner different from, say, Peyton Manning. But I grew up in the ’60s and have had some fairly extravagant hairdos myself, and I attended my high school graduation wearing platform shoes with four-inch heels. Me, I stopped judging on appearances long ago.</p>
<p>And even if you believed Vick mightn’t have been a model citizen, you knew this … how? Before the Ron Mexico civil action was filed in 2005, there wasn’t a hint of misdoings, and he’d been a Falcon since April 2001. In hindsight, the weird part wasn’t that we “knew all about” the most famous person in Atlanta but that we knew, as in really knowing, hardly anything.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>That’s why I’m intrigued by “The Michael Vick Project”, and what it might reveal. I thought I knew him. Turns out I only knew what I was allowed to see. I’m intrigued to see how he kept his lives compartmentalized. I’m intrigued, as the spies in John le Carre’s fictional Circus would say, by the tradecraft.</p></blockquote>
<p>Vick <a href="http://sportsradiointerviews.com/2010/02/10/michael-vick-admits-to-being-lazy-during-his-time-in-atlanta/">in an Atlanta radio interview this week</a> said the following:  </p>
<blockquote><p>On whether or not people ever saw the best that he could’ve been:</p>
<p>“No. Not at all. I think if I woulda applied myself, there was a lot more I could have done off the field and also in the film room that could have elevated my game to a totally different level. I was complacent at the time, somewhat lazy, and I kinda settled for mediocrity. I thought what I was doing was enough. I thought that would suffice and I didn’t have to do anything else. I thought as my career went on I would continue to play at a high level. Everything that I was doing off the field, in regards to the marijuana and everything else, it didn’t slow me down, but it definitely slowed my developmental process because it made me lazy in a sense and I wasn’t really focused and didn’t take things seriously. Now, I want to make the most out of the next couple of years out of my career. I want to play my best football up until the age of 34 or 35, so that’s my plan. I’m gonna put everything into it. Put my all into it.”</p>
<p>On the fact that he still had success even when he didn’t dedicate himself completely:</p>
<p>“Just imagine what I could’ve been doing if I really would have been applying myself. That’s a regret that I have. I’m just glad that I have an opportunity to make amends for what I didn’t do and try to recap that. That’s what I wanted to show in my documentary because people didn’t know that. I wanted a clean slate, I wanted to put all of that out there so that once this documentary aired and the series is over, then I can move on with my life and I don’t have to answer a lot of questions. I can just answer them through my actions.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Judging by the above paragraphs only, it sounds like he&#8217;s growing up.  </p>
<p>Why Germany <a href="http://fourfourtwo.com/blogs/championsleague/archive/2010/02/09/magic-numbers-bubbly-amp-brandreth.aspx">will win the upcoming World Cup</a>.  </p>
<p><a href="http://thenextweb.com/shareables/2010/01/05/pocahontas-avatar/">Did Avatar mercilessly steal from Pocahontas</a>?  </p>
<p>Lastly, Lamar Odom entertainingly pimping Powerbars.  Or something.  </p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/JxKrQNt5dMo&#038;color1=0x3a3a3a&#038;color2=0x999999&#038;hl=en_US&#038;feature=player_embedded&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/JxKrQNt5dMo&#038;color1=0x3a3a3a&#038;color2=0x999999&#038;hl=en_US&#038;feature=player_embedded&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://miraclecovers.com/2010/02/friday-links-0210/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2011 Super Bowl Odds</title>
		<link>http://miraclecovers.com/2010/02/2011-super-bowl-odds/</link>
		<comments>http://miraclecovers.com/2010/02/2011-super-bowl-odds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 20:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lou</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://miraclecovers.com/?p=684</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These were posted by Bodog this morning.  Make of that what you will.  
Team	Odds
Indianapolis	6.5
San Diego	8
New England	10
New Orleans	10
Pittsburgh	11
Dallas	12
Green Bay	12
Minnesota	12
Philadelphia	16
Baltimore	20
NY Giants	20
NY Jets	25
Tennessee	25
Atlanta	30
Cincinnati	30
Arizona	35
Chicago	35
Houston	35
Carolina	40
Miami	45
San Francisco	45
Seattle	45
Denver	50
Jacksonville	50
Washington	50
Buffalo	100
Cleveland	100
Detroit	100
Kansas City	100
Oakland	100
St. Louis	100
Tampa Bay	100
Defending champions at 10:1???  Atlanta at 30 is also appealing.  It&#8217;s really tempting to take the top 8 NFC teams, banking on the fact that one of them [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These were <a href="http://sports.bodog.com/sports-betting/football-futures.jsp">posted by Bodog this morning</a>.  Make of that what you will.  </p>
<p>Team	Odds<br />
Indianapolis	6.5<br />
San Diego	8<br />
New England	10<br />
New Orleans	10<br />
Pittsburgh	11<br />
Dallas	12<br />
Green Bay	12<br />
Minnesota	12<br />
Philadelphia	16<br />
Baltimore	20<br />
NY Giants	20<br />
NY Jets	25<br />
Tennessee	25<br />
Atlanta	30<br />
Cincinnati	30<br />
Arizona	35<br />
Chicago	35<br />
Houston	35<br />
Carolina	40<br />
Miami	45<br />
San Francisco	45<br />
Seattle	45<br />
Denver	50<br />
Jacksonville	50<br />
Washington	50<br />
Buffalo	100<br />
Cleveland	100<br />
Detroit	100<br />
Kansas City	100<br />
Oakland	100<br />
St. Louis	100<br />
Tampa Bay	100</p>
<p>Defending champions at 10:1???  Atlanta at 30 is also appealing.  It&#8217;s really tempting to take the top 8 NFC teams, banking on the fact that one of them should make the Super Bowl and then hedge the moneyline on an AFC team a year from now.  Probably not worth the effort considering you&#8217;d have to tie up your money with Bodog of all places for a year, but it&#8217;s something to think about.  </p>
<p>Saints at 10:1 still doesn&#8217;t feel right, though maybe I&#8217;m just biased based on the last few seasons.  </p>
<p>Comment away, especially if I&#8217;m missing something.  </p>
<p>EDIT: <a href="http://www.nationalfootballpost.com/Diner-morning-news-Odds-are-anyones-guess.html">Lombardi</a> makes an excellent point this morning I overlooked yesterday in that teams in the last 8 of the playoffs (IND, SD, NO, DAL, MIN, BAL, NYJ, ARI) cannot make significant free agent additions unless replacing a departing player.  </p>
<p>If you leave out those 8 teams, the top plays would seem to be NE, PIT, GB &#038; ATL.  Still awfully hard to tie up any significant $ on something a year away without a good feel for an outcome.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://miraclecovers.com/2010/02/2011-super-bowl-odds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Super Bowl Propping</title>
		<link>http://miraclecovers.com/2010/02/super-bowl-propping/</link>
		<comments>http://miraclecovers.com/2010/02/super-bowl-propping/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 17:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lou</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://miraclecovers.com/?p=682</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apologies for the lack of posting this week.  Real life + being sick = light blogging.  I&#8217;ll attempt to make up for it here by hopefully passing along some of the more appealing prop bets available from the literally hundreds available.  
Other sites have much more detailed analysis here and here.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apologies for the lack of posting this week.  Real life + being sick = light blogging.  I&#8217;ll attempt to make up for it here by hopefully passing along some of the more appealing prop bets available from the literally hundreds available.  </p>
<p>Other sites have much more detailed analysis <a href="http://footballoutsiders.com/game-previews/2010/super-bowl-xliv-preview">here</a> and <a href="http://vegaswatch.net/2010/02/most-ridiculous-super-bowl-xliv-props.html">here</a>.  If you are participating in a square and want/need to calculate your odds of winning, that link is <a href="http://www.pro-football-reference.com/blog/?p=5963">here</a>.  </p>
<p><strong>Dallas Clark over 68 yards receiving (-110)</strong></p>
<p>This is a really high number for a tight end, but Dallas Clark is more of a hybrid slot receiver than even Antonio Gates or Jason Witten, so this number is probably very close to the true line.  This is a high variance play, but I think Clark will see single coverage all day and will likely be the recipient of many checkdowns thanks to the Saints blitzing.  Another similar play is Joseph Addai over 2.5 receptions or over 18.5 receiving yards.  </p>
<p><strong>Total Penalties</strong></p>
<p>If anyone can find a prop bet on this, <strong>please let me know</strong>.  The Colts and Saints are two of the least penalized teams in the league and referee Scott green, to my complete and total joy <a href="http://footballoutsiders.com/game-previews/2010/super-bowl-xliv-preview">almost never calls roughing the passer. He&#8217;s thrown only seven flags for roughing the passer over the past three seasons, including zero during the entire 2008 season</a>.  Many of the roughing the passer penalties are simply things that happen in a game called &#8220;football&#8221; and it&#8217;s fantastic that a referee that subscribes to this belief will be in charge of the game.  </p>
<p><strong>Highest Rated Commercial Anheuser-Busch +200</strong></p>
<p>These odds have been <a href="http://vegaswatch.net/2010/02/most-ridiculous-super-bowl-xliv-props.html">heavily slashed from the +900!!!! opening</a>, but there&#8217;s still value here.  </p>
<blockquote><p>I think there is tremendous value in Anheuser-Busch and Doritos at Bookmaker here, and it goes beyond just comparing their odds to Bodog&#8217;s. Busch won ten years in a row before Doritos broke their impressive streak last year. Even in defeat, Busch showed very strong, with their ads placing both second and third. In 2008 Busch placed first, fifth, and sixth, with Doritos coming in fourth. And in 2007 the two companies dominated the standings, monopolizing the top seven spots. Even at +900, Busch actually has the shortest odds of any of Bookmaker&#8217;s 35 options; it&#8217;s like BM was aware that they should be the favorite, but had no idea just how dominant they&#8217;ve been.</p>
<p>As for this year&#8217;s game, the Clydesdales won&#8217;t be appearing, but Busch has purchased five minutes worth of ads, and their non-Clydesdale commercials have scored well in the past. Doritos is running a similar contest to the one that landed them the top spot last year; they&#8217;ll have three commercials during the game.</p></blockquote>
<p>Likely more degeneracy to follow between now and kickoff.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://miraclecovers.com/2010/02/super-bowl-propping/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rick J</title>
		<link>http://miraclecovers.com/2010/02/rick-j/</link>
		<comments>http://miraclecovers.com/2010/02/rick-j/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 20:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pat</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://miraclecovers.com/?p=680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have been trying to find gambling blogs kind of like this one but I am not having too much success.  With that said, I came across this guy. 
http://rickjshandicappingpicks.blogspot.com/
He is by no means funny but he seems to have a pretty good record and know what the hell he&#8217;s talking about so check him out.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been trying to find gambling blogs kind of like this one but I am not having too much success.  With that said, I came across this guy. </p>
<p><a href="http://rickjshandicappingpicks.blogspot.com/">http://rickjshandicappingpicks.blogspot.com/</a></p>
<p>He is by no means funny but he seems to have a pretty good record and know what the hell he&#8217;s talking about so check him out.  Rick seems to include some wall street stuff on a stock or two that he likes so watch out for that.  Please leave a comment if you find a blog about sports gambling that has some humor to it.  No poker blogs please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://miraclecovers.com/2010/02/rick-j/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Final Four Picks</title>
		<link>http://miraclecovers.com/2010/01/final-four-picks/</link>
		<comments>http://miraclecovers.com/2010/01/final-four-picks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 20:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pat</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Basketball]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://miraclecovers.com/?p=677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here are my final four picks at this moment, obviously forsaking the fact that we don&#8217;t know actual brackets yet
Syracuse
Mich St
Kentucky
Texas
Leave a comment if you want to make your own four picks and throw money on things.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are my final four picks at this moment, obviously forsaking the fact that we don&#8217;t know actual brackets yet</p>
<p>Syracuse</p>
<p>Mich St</p>
<p>Kentucky</p>
<p>Texas</p>
<p>Leave a comment if you want to make your own four picks and throw money on things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://miraclecovers.com/2010/01/final-four-picks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thursday Links</title>
		<link>http://miraclecovers.com/2010/01/thursday-links-15/</link>
		<comments>http://miraclecovers.com/2010/01/thursday-links-15/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lou</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://miraclecovers.com/?p=671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;To all the people watching, I can never thank you enough for your kindness to me and I&#8217;ll think about it for the rest of my life. All I ask of you is one thing: please don&#8217;t be cynical. I hate cynicism- it&#8217;s my least favorite quality and it doesn&#8217;t lead anywhere.
Nobody in life gets [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;To all the people watching, I can never thank you enough for your kindness to me and I&#8217;ll think about it for the rest of my life. All I ask of you is one thing: please don&#8217;t be cynical. I hate cynicism- it&#8217;s my least favorite quality and it doesn&#8217;t lead anywhere.</p>
<p>Nobody in life gets exactly what they thought they were going to get. But if you work really hard and you&#8217;re kind, amazing things will happen.&#8221; &#8211; <a href="http://www.nj.com/entertainment/tv/index.ssf/2010/01/conan_obriens_tonight_show_far.html">Conan O&#8217;Brien saying goodbye from the Tonight Show</a></p>
<p>The Football Outsiders guys wrote up their worst of 2009 team.  If you enjoy snide comments at the expense of pro athletes, <a href="http://footballoutsiders.com/print/23409">this column is for you</a>.  </p>
<blockquote><p>So, Sabby Piscitelli. It’s kind of a fun name, in that juvenile, vaguely dirty way some Italian names are. His house was burglarized during the win against Green Bay this year, and burglary is wrong and illegal, so he has my sympathies. I hope he was covered by insurance. If you do an Internet search on him, he’s apparently somewhat of a favorite of the ladies. They had an easy time finding him this year; all they had to do was look at who was supposed to be there when Tampa Bay gave up a long touchdown pass.</p></blockquote>
<p>For those more herbally inclined, there&#8217;s <a href="http://www.covers.com/articles/featureArticle.aspx?theArt=180322">Blaze of glory: Marijuana&#8217;s greatest moments in sports</a>.  </p>
<p>Bill Simmons did a <a href="http://podloc.andomedia.com/dloadTrack.mp3?prm=1629xhttp://podloc.andohs.net/dloadTrack.mp3?prm=2864xhttp://a.espnradio.com/podcenter/sportsguy/simmons100126.mp3">post-show podcast</a> on Jersey Shore this week.  His initial podcast on the show is <a href="http://podloc.andohs.net/dloadTrack.mp3?prm=2864xhttp://a.espnradio.com/podcenter/sportsguy/simmons091207.mp3">here</a>.  </p>
<p>Lastly, some Sportscenter fueled entertainment.<br />
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/G17zp0_26xU&#038;color1=0xb1b1b1&#038;color2=0xcfcfcf&#038;hl=en_US&#038;feature=player_embedded&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/G17zp0_26xU&#038;color1=0xb1b1b1&#038;color2=0xcfcfcf&#038;hl=en_US&#038;feature=player_embedded&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://miraclecovers.com/2010/01/thursday-links-15/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://podloc.andomedia.com/dloadTrack.mp3?prm=1629xhttp://podloc.andohs.net/dloadTrack.mp3?prm=2864xhttp://a.espnradio.com/podcenter/sportsguy/simmons100126.mp3" length="13072332" type="audio/mpeg" />
<enclosure url="http://podloc.andohs.net/dloadTrack.mp3?prm=2864xhttp://a.espnradio.com/podcenter/sportsguy/simmons091207.mp3" length="13682364" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Picks</title>
		<link>http://miraclecovers.com/2010/01/picks/</link>
		<comments>http://miraclecovers.com/2010/01/picks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pat</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Basketball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://miraclecovers.com/?p=667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am going to start keeping a record of picks I like.  They will be broken down by a variety of classifications (sport, confidence in pick, underdog, road, etc.) depending on how much effort I put into this thing.  This will be Day 1
Grizzlies (-1.5) @ Detroit &#8211; Two units
Bulls (+5.5) @ Oklahoma &#8211; One [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am going to start keeping a record of picks I like.  They will be broken down by a variety of classifications (sport, confidence in pick, underdog, road, etc.) depending on how much effort I put into this thing.  This will be Day 1</p>
<p><strong>Grizzlies (-1.5) </strong>@ Detroit &#8211; Two units</p>
<p><strong>Bulls (+5.5)</strong> @ Oklahoma &#8211; One unit</p>
<p>One bad gambling tendency is that I am a sucker for betting teams strictly with points in mind, as if the game were being played in a bubble.  This ends up not giving enough credence to home (court, field, polo turf) advantage.  The Grizzlies are clearly the better of the two teams in the first game, but they are pretty horrible on the road.  Let&#8217;s see what happens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://miraclecovers.com/2010/01/picks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
