When Good/Great Programs Have a Down Year – Part 2
Following up on Pat’s post, below records against the spread for selected teams this year compared to their actual record the past two seasons:
There have been some attempts to try and predict teams by using the number of minutes returning and then a variable to represent the quality of freshmen, but I’m not aware of anything that’s actually worked and worked well. See Texas on this year’s list as a perfect example. They were winning unimpressively (and not covering) before finally starting to lose games when 2010 rolled around.
The tom and bottom teams on this list are always going to be the ones most over/under valued by the general gambling public. Finding & betting on these teams before they get all popular is kind of the idea.
For example, anyone who was paying attention to Notre Dame basketball noticed their sudden transition into a slower paced team in February.
“I went to sleep that night and just thought, ‘We’ve got to do something different,’’ Brey said of his Solomon-inspired epiphany. “We’ve had burn – where we run the clock in the final four minutes – in our playbook forever. So I just told the guys, ‘We’re going to extend burn to 40 minutes.’’
The burn has scorched opponents. Since Brey put the brakes on the usually run and gun, up and down Irish, Notre Dame has ripped off five wins in a row and gone from not being in the NCAA Tournament conversation to playing for a seed. The Irish defeated Seton Hall 68-56 Wednesday night.
Notre Dame lost by a basket against West Virginia in the Big East semis, ending their six game win streak, but every since their 91-89 loss to Louisville has hit the under.
John Gasaway from Basketball Prospectus added this bit of goodness:
Notre Dame defense, first 14 Big East games vs. last five
Pace: possessions per 40 minutes; Opp. PPP: opponent points per possessionPace Opp. PPP
First 14 65.8 1.13
Last five 56.9 0.97Speaking of transformations, this is not a matter of a coach simply taking his foot off the accelerator. More like yanking the emergency brake so hard it flew off. Notre Dame is now locked in a pace cage match to the death with Wisconsin and Arizona State for the title of slowest late-season major-conference team.
Why is the Irish D so much better all the sudden? Partly it’s because in their sassy new Big Ten look ND has improved noticeably on the defensive glass while committing fewer fouls. (Again, feel free to draw a Wisconsin parallel.) But far and away the largest single before-and-after difference here is opponents’ threes. They used to go in (over the first 14 Big East games) 37 percent of the time. Now (last five games) they go in just 24 percent of the time.
Interestingly, everything else has stayed the same, even at the dramatically slower pace. Just like before, teams playing Notre Dame never turn the ball over and, indeed, opponent two-point percentage has actually gone up a hair. It pretty much all comes down to the threes.
Certainly I can envisage the Irish playing better and more locked-in perimeter D in games this slow, just like it makes sense that more minutes for a 6-7 athlete like Carleton Scott would have an impact.
It took bookmakers three full games to even have a hint as to what was going on, and it wasn’t until after the fifth game against notoriously uptempo Seton Hall that the lines even started getting adjusted. And Notre Dame has still been smashing the under which means the lines still weren’t right. Here’s the list:
The Irish play Old Dominion in an early game Thursday and the line is currently 122. Old Dominion plays at a similar tempo to UND’s last two opponents Pittsburgh and West Virginia. It’s worth a look if not a play. Of course, those that actually watched the games over the last few weeks (hint: not me) and took action already should be sitting on enough cash to make this play.
One last bit of reading material to recommend for bracket selections: Seth Davis, who you’ll see on TV a lot over the next three weeks, called a bunch of coaches and asked them for their off-the-record thoughts on a bunch of teams in this year’s field. The insights are very telling. I’ll quote my favorite below and then tell you to read HERE and HERE.
KENTUCKY: The main question with them is obviously their inexperience. Regardless of what people say, freshmen are freshmen, and all it takes is one freshman moment in a single-elimination tournament to end your season. The second thing is their perimeter shooting. Statistically their percentages are respectable, but their volume of outside shots is not high. Nobody gets up and down the floor like John Wall, but when you get into the tournament, the pace tends to slow down. Teams that are averaging 75 points a game are going to get 70 or fewer. If people put a premium on possessions, they are going to have to make perimeter shots. DeMarcus Cousins’ emergence offensively has taken the focal point off of Wall, and to [John] Calipari’s credit they’re going more inside-out. Against Wall, you have to change your looks and try to get him confused, and he will turn it over by trying to go too fast. Then at the end of a shot clock, you have to make him make jump shots. There is no doubt Cousins is the best post player in college basketball. He’s a load on the block, and it’s incredible he gets one of every four shots taken off the offensive glass. [Patrick] Patterson is almost an afterthought, but he hit the big three against Vanderbilt, so you know he’s going to make big plays.
Read More: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/writers/seth_davis/02/22/hoop.thoughts/1.html
