Pat’s MLB Over/Unders

Let’s get into it. The contest is to pick 10 teams against the Vegas over/under totals.  The #10 is your top confidence pick, with #1 your shakiest.  Without further ado…

10)  Chicago White Sox (over 85.5)  -  This pick is more an indication of my disregard for the competition in the AL Central than with the White Sox, though they themselves certainly seem to have a good thing going this year.  Adam Dunn obviously is a big acquisition.  John Danks is their listed 3rd, but at an age where another year will only help him, he could turn into a legit #2 during the course of the season.  And that depth enables them to have Edwin Jackson towards the back end of the rotation where he probably belongs at this point until he consistently proves himself.  Similar thoughts on Mark Teahen, great extra OF, IF guy coming off the bench, or more accurately, just not starting.

9)  Boston (over 95)  -  Red Sox won 89 games last year while suffering an avalanche of injuries.  They add Adrian and Crawford, which will more than compensate for the loss of Beltre.  Patently explosive offense, and the pitching should be good-borderline-spectacular in stretches throughout the year.  This is the team the Yankees used to be when they were dominating baseball in the late 90s, early 2000s.

8)  Baltimore (over 76)  -  The O’s are a team a lot of people are hot on after years of meteoric mediocrity.  They remind me of the Cincy Reds going into last year.  Lots of subdued but persistent talk and expectations in the background.  If Adam Jones has a real break-out season, and Derek Lee and Justin Duchscherer (The Duchsch) stay healthy, they should clear this number.  Definitely helped by weaker Yanks and Rays teams.

7)  Kansas City (under 69.5)  -  I don’t love this pick, any time you are picking a professional team to win less than 70 games you are on suspect ground IMO.  But Kansas City failed to clear this number last year when they had Zack.  Instead they go into the season with #1 pitcher Jeff Francis, or as espn describes him, “a sleeper starter in AL-only (fantasy) leagues.”  Yikes.  As a side note, at this exact moment in time, espn has Melky Cabrera listed as Kansas City’s Opening Day center and right fielder, which cannot be good for business.

6)  San Diego (under 76.5)  -  Wow.  That lineup…goodness.  Their centerpiece is Ryan Ludwick.  Soon to be 33, career 104 HRs, Ryan Ludwick.  This team had the 28th rated slugging percentage in the league with Adrian Gonzalez.  Obviously not a hitter’s park, but did they play all their games there last year?

5)  NY Yankees (under 91.5)  -  Don’t like that this means I’m betting on the Yanks to essentially finish with a win total in the 80s.  Ehhhh.   But Pettite is gone, and if you don’t think that makes a difference you are nuts.  I was just about to write how the back end of their rotation is a disaster with Burnett and Garcia only to click on their depth chart to see that Burnett is the listed #2.  Burnett cannot be as bad this year as last, but that is far from a rave endorsement.  In addition, the Yankees do not have their typical 1-7 lineup of ridiculousness.  They have three hitters that scare you and a whole lot of OK after that.  And the AL East is stronger at the bottom this year.

4)  Houston (over 71.5)  -  I actually started this thinking of taking the under.  But this number is just a little too low.  Some people might say, ‘well, they sucked last year, and now they don’t have Oswalt.’  But it is the Astros horrifying offense that is the issue, not the pitching.  And this is what the argument boils down to.  No matter how disastrous (just learned how to spell that) the hitting can and will be at times for Houston this year, this rotation just isn’t the type that leads a team to 60 something wins, as a unit they are too good for that.  And it should be noted that no matter how anemic the Astros offense has been over the last few years, they never dropped below 73 wins.  Let’s go over.

3)  Arizona (under 72.5)  -  As in essentially every bet, it would be great if this number was a little different.  Aaron Heilman excluded, Joe Saunders is the wily veteran among the starting pitchers and he isn’t 30 yet, which means this group is dominated by potential.  Their numbers 1, 3, and 4 starters do not have a combined 50 decisions in the majors (49) by my count.  At 3B, Melvin Mora is 39, assuming Venezuela doesn’t have those birth certificate problems baseball seems to like, and he somehow managed to hit only 7 HRs last year playing 113 games for Colorado.  Still, as noted, they are young and potentially talented in a lot of places, would love this at 76.

2)  Cincinnati (over 84.5)  -  Last year, got lucky with these guys taking the over simply because of the enormous amount of chatter that was surrounding them.  So what the hey, let’s take them again.  And this pick is based almost entirely on the Reds offensive potential.  They have five players with easy 20+ HR pop and that is not including Scott Rolen, who hit 20 himself last year.  Their division is certainly not the strongest thing going.  The Cards number is 84.5 also, this is essentially a vote for a St Louis under.

1)  Oakland (over 83.5)  -  Where the Cincy pick comes down to offense, this comes down to the idea that, when healthy, the A’s probably have the best pitching in the AL West.  They certainly do not have the best hitting, but they did add Matsui, and I think a huge X factor this year is 3B Kevin Kouzmanoff (pretty sure it is a contract year, 29 years old).  If the Angels pitching was even fractionally better I’d have them here, but it isn’t.

MLB Over/Unders

These are the win totals according to pinnacle.  For spreads where one side is -120 or higher I will note so accordingly.  We will get into analysis, predictions, and occasional reminders of how badly I kicked Lou’s ass in this contest last year in upcoming entries.

  • Atlanta  88
  • Arizona  72.5
  • Baltimore  76
  • Boston  95  (over -128)
  • Chicago Cubs  81.5  (over -131)
  • Chicago White Sox  85.5
  • Cincinnati  84.5  (over -146)
  • Cleveland  71  (over -132)
  • Colorado  86  (over -136)
  • Detroit  83.5  (over -131)
  • Florida  82
  • Houston  71.5
  • Kansas City  69.5  (under -131)
  • LA Angels  83
  • LA Dodgers  84  (under -120)
  • Milwaukee  85.5
  • Minnesota  86  (under -129)
  • NY Mets  77.5  (under -136)
  • NY Yankees  91.5  (under -130)
  • Oakland  83.5
  • Philadelphia  97  (under -137)
  • Pittsburgh  68  (under -129)
  • San Diego  76  (under -148)
  • San Francisco  88
  • Seattle  70
  • St Louis  84.5  (under -141)
  • Tampa Bay  84.5  (under -127)
  • Texas  86.5  (over -120)
  • Toronto  76.5
  • Washington  71  (over -144)

Program vs. Year (Start of “Units tracking”)

Ohio St – much better team this year.  Kentucky – much better program historically.  Kentucky getting 6 points.  These types of games happen all the time.  The question is, does the line get skewed in these instances at all since Kentucky is such a storied program or do things pretty much hold to form.  If all the players and coaches stayed the same but the team names switched to Vanderbilt and Wash St, would the line be the same?  Going to try to track these as the months go by whenever I spot them.  My gut reaction at the moment is to really like Ohio St at -6.

10 Units – Ohio St -6

Not Scared of Tiger

Pinnacle has an interesting golf prop on Tiger Woods:

Tiger Woods to Win a Major in 2011

From last weekend’s tournament

Rookie Brendan Steele couldn’t believe what he saw from one of golf’s all-time greats in his first tournament of the year on Sunday. He basically saw Woods, still winless since his infamous Thanksgiving car crash and ensuing public divorce, quit on the course.

“I don’t think he gave it everything today,” Steele told Sports Illustrated following the round at the Farmers Insurance Open. “Once it started going in the wrong direction, I don’t think it had his full attention.”

It just goes to show how far the world’s former No. 1 has fallen.Tiger never used to concede a shot, let alone give up on a back nine or an entire round. And he almost certainly would have never been called out by a rookie several years ago.

The thought of Woods alone used to send rookies cowering back to the clubhouse. His presence would make them wilt.

Now, Tiger’s competition has improved drastically and the once unbeatable aura that surrounded him has vanished. Players are no longer afraid of him on the course and apparently they’re willing to attack him off it as well.

As best I can tell, Tiger has won 14 Majors in 52 appearances starting with his first in at Augusta in 1997. That’s just over 25%. At -127, Pinnacle is basically installing Tiger as +630 on each major. As of right now that’s insane, or at least it would be for any other golfer not named Tiger Woods.

Phil Mickelson is the favorite to win this week’s Phoenix Open at +750 and I can’t imagine that the field in a Major is appreciably easier, nor that Tiger will be playing appreciably better than 90+% of the field in one anytime soon. His scoring average of over 71 since returning to golf in 2010 compares favorably with the likes of Ian Poulter, Sergio Garcia and YE Yang. For any of them to receive less than +2500 to win a tournament, regardless of form would be ridiculous.

There was talk on PTI last week over Tiger’s slump and its causes, whether they were more mental or physical. Whatever the cause, there’s been no suggestion of “Old Tiger” returning as yet. The most likely scenario has him back as excellent but not Barry Bonds on steroids at some point and even with that, there’s still value here. Max bet on NO, -1whatever.

Bears/Packers

Let’s talk about the Bears/Packers game.  The line of Packers -3.5 is pretty damn interesting.  There are several factors that Vegas had to deal with in making the line, the most important probably being that essentially every one and their mother seems to bet the Packers.  I’ve brought this example up a few times on this site but the classic case was last year when their road playoff game against the Cardinals went from Cards -3 to Pack -2.5.

When I got over the shock of seeing a road #6 seed as a favorite in a conference championship, my thought was Vegas simply said, “You know what, we know you’re going to bet Green Bay anyway, here.  Deal with this.  Minus three, Bitches.”  And bitches did deal, the original line I saw had GB -3 and the next thing it’s -3.5 and even -4 at some places.  This in spite of the fact that the teams split the season series, and the Packers only won the final game in Green Bay, a game they had to win, and a game that meant nothing to Chicago, 10-3.

There is one crucial stat that GB supporters can look to and that’s point differential.  Did you know that the Packers were second in the NFL in point differential at +148?  This with Aaron Rodgers missing time and/or half woozy at points during the season.  And now he’s healthy.  This is where people seriously betting GB make their case.  The Packers, when healthy this year, play so well, that you have to ignore the ridiculousness of betting against a home underdog, that this Packer team is one of those special teams where guidelines like home field advantage don’t really apply.  Hence why they walk into Chicago a favorite, as they walked into Atlanta as a pick ‘ em against a well rested team that had beaten them two months earlier.

For my money (and I mean that, I have 50 dollars on this with JaPan) I am going with Chicago.  I actually grabbed them at +3 thinking the line would only move in the direction of a pick em, oops.  I could see Cutler throwing 4 INTs, one or more for a pick 6, and GB winning 38-14.  But at the end of the day I think of this game as being pretty even from a match-up perspective, with the key differences being the game is in Chicago and I am getting 3 points right from the kickoff.  We’ll see what happens.  The team Green Bay finished second to in point differential?  The Patriots, oops.

As for Jets/Pitt, my gut is to like the Jets at +3.5.

Week 17 Picks

Steelers -6 (-125) I just see Pittsburgh, with a “win-and-get-in” situation for the bye and the division, take care of a struggling Browns team at home today.  Plus out of all the lines where this type of situation occurs, this one is the most reasonable to bet on, even with the juice.

Falcons -13 John Fox just got canned, the Falcons lost a very winnable game on Monday night versus the Saints, and homefield is on the line for Atlanta.  You know Mike Smith must of gave these guys hell in the meetings this week watching the Saints game film, especially on offense where they had problems running the ball.  Methinks they take it out on the Panthers today, and be motivated enough to get a big lead to pull starters in the 4th.

Packers/Bears Over 42 Resting or no resting, these teams will score a lot today, especially with how good Rodgers looks at home vs the Giants this week, and the Bears getting big plays in between 5-6 plays of superior mediocrity on offense led by Jay Cutler.  Plus Cutler COULD throw a few TDs to the Packers D, too.  And you throw in the Devin Hester, but I doubt that because the Packers were dumb enough to kick to him on Week 4 and paid the price

4 team Teaser @ 3-1 (You can also add the Packers -4 in this one @ 4.5-1 if the Falcons game is already decided as then the Bears will just be resting people):

Steelers PK

Colts -4

Ravens -4

Falcons -8

For those of you paying attention…

And you know who you are…sean is lighting it up.  If you look at Sean’s picks it is amazing how common sense his approach is.  Talking about jets/bears over, “too much talent on the field here to not score.”  Discussing the Packers, “Green Bay, IMO, is just TOO good to NOT make the playoffs.”  So what does he do, he bets accordingly.  He saw the same line we all did, Ravens -3.5 at Cleveland and while we were all rationalizing how the Browns would cover, Sean bet the Ravens.  Well done, Sean.

Week 16 Picks

GB -3 vs NYG

Eli Manning (who NEVER talks) spoke up in the locker room this week, telling his team to shake off that last epic fail of a loss vs Philly and speaking the importance of this game vs Green Bay, who looked awesome on Sunday night and probably would of won if Rodgers started.  Green Bay, IMO, is just TOO good to NOT make the playoffs (and they arn’t coached by Norv Turner), so I’m gonna take the pack here to take care of business at home and grab that final 6th playoff spot.

Teaser: NYG/CHI O 30 + HOU/DEN O 43

Even though a Rex Ryan led defense is always ready to play “foot-ball“, too much talent on the field here to not score. Houston and Denver are starting turnstiles on their defensive lines (minus Mario Williams) vs two teams who can run the ball with anybody with Foster and Tebow.

I mean ,the Jets are just destined to make the AFC Championship game vs the Pats, where they are losing 35-10 i nthe 4th quarter as fans chant, “smell our feet!”, right?

Rams -3

Because I think the football gods will NOT allow a 7-9 team to get into the playoffs (Imagine that line!).

Holiday Tease

Merry Christmas everybody!  Been away for a while as I had some login issues, traveled to Vegas, and was crowned a drinking champion along with Jaguars LB Eric Alexander.  I’ve also been logging my bets on:

http://www.twitter.com/seanismoney

Follow me there for daily bets, quips, and intelligent thoughts that are 160 characters or less.

I’ve been doing well this year, batting .695 for the year.  I was at .775, but I’ve been miracle covered the last few weeks (including The Debacle on a Thursday Night in Tennessee when the Titans scored a TD with NO time left to lose 30-28…….the last drive of that game deserves a column on its own).

Today’s tease: Miami Heat +7 and the Over for the Dallas/Cardinals game 39.   I finally have a reason to root for The Douche 3, as nothing trumps my disdain more for Lebron, than the Lakers.

I also took the Ravens @ -3.5 on Monday; I just don’t see them losing this game with so much on the line.  I’ll have more thoughts going into this Sunday about the Packers, and the Jets, who considering how there season has gone along with the foot-fetish news with Rex Ryan, are fans of the agony of victory, and the THRILL of defeat.

On a final note, I got some new games for the XBOX 360 today.   Just played some capture the flag with Chad Ochocinco on Call of Duty: Black Ops.

And as you all know, I have a great love for sports games, so I am really excited to start a season in this title below later:

WNBA Live

College B’ball

For those of you interested the Matrix site was wrong with its Wash St pick.  I opted not to bet with the site before the game.  The runners of the site note that they tend to struggle more during the early parts of the year because the formula they use relies heavily on current year game results, and K St had been blown out by Duke previously, which seemed to me would skew things a bit too much.  I just stayed away entirely from the game, which K St won by 5.  My original plan was to tell VT about the computer’s pick but when I saw the pick, I didn’t.  That pick is one that does not sync with VT’s betting style.  VT will definitely bet some underdogs but his trademark is to bet favorites who he feels are not getting enough respect.  When a top tier is favored by only a few points.  Betting Wash St in that game, especially when they are only +2.5, is a complete 180.   Portland 58 Montana 54, Marist 80 Niagara 72,  Idaho 63 North Dakota 42, Georgia 66 UAB 64, Iona 94 Canisus 85, Villanova 71 St Joseph’s 60 This means that ATS…

  1. Home teams were 3-3
  2. Ranked or higher ranked teams were 0-1
  3. Favorites and underdogs were 3-3

Home, away, favorite, underdog, all end up being at .500 ATS throughout this project, which means Vegas is batting 1.000.