<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2009 NFL Week 2 Picks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://miraclecovers.com/2009/09/2009-nfl-week-2-picks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://miraclecovers.com/2009/09/2009-nfl-week-2-picks/</link>
	<description>Winning at Sports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2012 10:59:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lou</title>
		<link>http://miraclecovers.com/2009/09/2009-nfl-week-2-picks/comment-page-1/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>lou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://miraclecovers.com/?p=154#comment-33</guid>
		<description>Yeah, for you :)  Here&#039;s the thing, Cleveland and Detroit might turn out to be the two worst teams in the league this year (which would make CLE +4 in week 1 the dumbest bet of 2009, but that&#039;s not the point here).  Legitimately good teams crush the poor ones, they don&#039;t just scrape by.  I watched part of both the Vikings games so far and they don&#039;t look overwhelming.  A look at the box scores confirms this.  I mean the difference against Detroit was the Lions losing contain on the backside twice against Peterson.

I&#039;m still not ready to change my preseason view that Minny has major questions with their head coach and turnover prone QB (pick one).  Same thing with Atlanta.  Gonzalez is great, but he can&#039;t play DT or cover anyone.  Other than the two games versus Tampa and Buffalo, their schedule is brutal.  

Still thinking on ATL-NE BTW.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, for you :)  Here&#8217;s the thing, Cleveland and Detroit might turn out to be the two worst teams in the league this year (which would make CLE +4 in week 1 the dumbest bet of 2009, but that&#8217;s not the point here).  Legitimately good teams crush the poor ones, they don&#8217;t just scrape by.  I watched part of both the Vikings games so far and they don&#8217;t look overwhelming.  A look at the box scores confirms this.  I mean the difference against Detroit was the Lions losing contain on the backside twice against Peterson.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m still not ready to change my preseason view that Minny has major questions with their head coach and turnover prone QB (pick one).  Same thing with Atlanta.  Gonzalez is great, but he can&#8217;t play DT or cover anyone.  Other than the two games versus Tampa and Buffalo, their schedule is brutal.  </p>
<p>Still thinking on ATL-NE BTW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://miraclecovers.com/2009/09/2009-nfl-week-2-picks/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 04:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://miraclecovers.com/?p=154#comment-32</guid>
		<description>Yeah....good thing gambling is based on certain outcomes and not other arbitrary statistics (like who is winning or tied at half)!

On a side note, my favorite two preseason futures, Minny over 9.5 wins and Atlanta over 9.5 wins, are looking pretty good.  Btw, Atlanta is for real and the NFC, with the exception of the Vikings, looks weaker than everyone expected.  The Falcons could make some noise this year. Have a little confidence in your team.  It would have helped your bottom line the last two weeks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah&#8230;.good thing gambling is based on certain outcomes and not other arbitrary statistics (like who is winning or tied at half)!</p>
<p>On a side note, my favorite two preseason futures, Minny over 9.5 wins and Atlanta over 9.5 wins, are looking pretty good.  Btw, Atlanta is for real and the NFC, with the exception of the Vikings, looks weaker than everyone expected.  The Falcons could make some noise this year. Have a little confidence in your team.  It would have helped your bottom line the last two weeks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lou</title>
		<link>http://miraclecovers.com/2009/09/2009-nfl-week-2-picks/comment-page-1/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>lou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://miraclecovers.com/?p=154#comment-31</guid>
		<description>Right...Vikings were still losing (or tied can&#039;t remember) at half and still covered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right&#8230;Vikings were still losing (or tied can&#8217;t remember) at half and still covered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://miraclecovers.com/2009/09/2009-nfl-week-2-picks/comment-page-1/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 17:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://miraclecovers.com/?p=154#comment-30</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s Minny at Detroit this week. Was Saints vs Detroit last week.  Remember, I won $20 from you.   Which is exactly what is going to happen this week.  I&#039;m telling you, Minny is underrated.  If the Saints are 18 points better than Detroit than Adrian Peterson and the Vikes should win in a blow out. I&#039;d say 38-14 with Peterson and Megatron each getting a couple of touchdowns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s Minny at Detroit this week. Was Saints vs Detroit last week.  Remember, I won $20 from you.   Which is exactly what is going to happen this week.  I&#8217;m telling you, Minny is underrated.  If the Saints are 18 points better than Detroit than Adrian Peterson and the Vikes should win in a blow out. I&#8217;d say 38-14 with Peterson and Megatron each getting a couple of touchdowns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

